W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998

Re: Connection tokens

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 11:54:22 -0700
To: "J.P. Martin-Flatin" <martin-flatin@epfl.ch>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9807301154.aa04641@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/291
>I disagree: I don't think different implementations should be allowed to 
>use their own proprietary tokens. Allowing this would result in 
>interoperability issues.

Well, I completely disagree with that opinion.  The reason we added
Connection is because there was no way to indicate connection-only
extensions in HTTP.  We didn't need it for standard additions, except
for the obvious problem that all new standards look like extensions
to an already deployed implementation.

Allowing this is what solves the interoperability issue.

Received on Friday, 31 July 1998 15:04:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC