W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998

Re: ISSUE: Expect Header Field Problem

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 17:52:39 +0000
Message-Id: <35C20467.699DFB38@agranat.com>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/283
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> >At least in the case of CGIs they often ignore
> >the method

> Does the server ignore them as well and just hands off the script 
> regardless?

The CGI spec (either the existing 1.1 spec or the new 1.2) just makes the
method available to the program - if the program doesn't look, it doesn't. 
Some of the CGI libraries make this easy to do as well - parameters are
parsed by the library from a GET query string or a POST body transparently,
for example.  I've tried bouncing TRACE and OPTIONS requests off various
URLs that were obviously scripts and many respond as though the request were
a GET. 

I just took a (very) quick peek at the Apache documentation for adding
modules, and found a similar API - the method is passed by the server to the
module, so the core server itself doesn't even appear to have a way to know
what methods might be handled or not.  Pretty good design if you are
optimizing for flexibility.

Scott Lawrence           Consulting Engineer      <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.  Embedded Web Technology   http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Friday, 31 July 1998 10:54:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC