W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998

Re: ISSUE: Expect Header Field Problem

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 15:26:58 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/275
At 19:20 7/28/98 +0000, Scott Lawrence wrote:

>I believe that the MUST should stand; making it a SHOULD renders the Expect
>feature almost useless.

I agree, but isn't this in fact the case in practice? Wouldn't it be better
to let Mandatory handle this as it has a stronger mechanism for enforcing
client based requirements based on the M- method name prefix?

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Thursday, 30 July 1998 15:54:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC