W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998

Re: ISSUE CREATE: Proposed resolution

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 19:23:30 +0000
Message-Id: <35BE2532.19C4A68C@agranat.com>
To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

> Action: Add this clarification to section 10.2.2:
> 
>         A 201 response MAY contain an Etag response header field
>         indicating the current value of the entity tag for the
>         created requested variant, see [14.19].

Since I hadn't noticed that this might not have been allowed before and our
implementation does it, I fully support this change :-)

-- 
Scott Lawrence            Consulting Engineer        <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.   Embedded Web Technology     http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 1998 12:26:28 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:19 EDT