W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1998


From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 98 11:35:22 MDT
Message-Id: <9807151835.AA04844@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: Richard Gray <rlgray@us.ibm.com>
Cc: jg@pa.dec.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/230
    And I just noticed that 14.8 Authorization, special case (1)
    mentions "proxy-maxage".  I assume that is intended to be
No, "proxy-maxage" was the original proposed name for "s-maxage".
(Roy pointed out that the relevant consideration was whether or
not a cache was "shared", not whether or not it was a "proxy".)
This section seems to have been missed during the rewording.

Jim, please make sure that all instances of "proxy-maxage"
have been replaced by "s-maxage", in both the HTTP/1.1 spec
and in the Authentication spec.

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 1998 12:26:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC