W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1998

Re: new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:38:36 -0500 (EST)
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980331113745.4051C-100000@alice.agranat.com>


I too find Jeffs wording to be an improvement, and don't believe that in
any way changes the intent (that is, I think that it is editorial).

Received on Tuesday, 31 March 1998 08:40:03 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gisle Aas: "Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges?"
Previous message: rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com: "new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers"
In reply to: Jeffrey Mogul: "new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "new editorial issue: redundancy in 3.7.2 (Multipart Types)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:14 EDT