W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1998

Re: Editorial issue 304-SHOULD

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 98 11:54:34 PST
Message-Id: <9803121954.AA21370@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5461
Right, this ought to be a SHOULD.

Interestingly enough, this "bug" basically goes back to RFC1945,
where it says:

      c) If the resource has not been modified since a valid
         If-Modified-Since date, the server shall return a 304 (not
         modified) response.

RFC2119 says that "SHALL" and "MUST" mean the same thing, although
I'm not sure that was the intention in RFC1945.

Received on Thursday, 12 March 1998 11:56:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:22 UTC