W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1998

Re: editorial issue TRANSPARENT-PROXY.

From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:52:50 +0000
Message-Id: <34EE1752.A6B360E7@algroup.co.uk>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Jim Gettys wrote:
> 
> Here are some clarifications around proxies that Roy was kind enough
> to draft up, to clarify when requirements apply to transparent proxies
> vs. proxies performing other actions (e.g. annotation).
>                                 - Jim
> 
> View: Browse HTML    Browse Raw Text
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:34:23 -0800
> To: jg@w3.org
> Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, lawrence@agranat.com,
> dmk@research.bell-labs.com,
>         joshco@microsoft.com
> Subject: transparent proxy changes
> 
> As per our discussion this morning, I wrote up a definition for
> transparent and non-transparent proxies.  I also went through the rev-01
> spec and found all places where there is any difference between transparent
> and non-transparent behavior.  Changes are below.

I've read this fairly carefully. It looks OK to me.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
Received on Friday, 20 February 1998 15:55:48 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:13 EDT