W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

RE: doubt

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 12:09:02 -0800
Message-Id: <01BD0A1B.66BD03E0.ejw@ics.uci.edu>
To: 'Ramya T V' <ramyatv@wipinfo.soft.net>, HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4976

To my eye, this is an error in RFC 2068.  Fortunately, this error has been 
caught, and draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-01 does list Accept-Ranges in 
Section 6.2 as a response header.

- Jim

On Tuesday, December 16, 1997 1:27 AM, Ramya T V 
[SMTP:ramyatv@wipinfo.soft.net] wrote:
>      Hi,
>       I am sorry if this is not the right mailing list to ask this doubt,
>       but I hope someone can help me out with this.
>       RFC2068 for HTTP/1.1 specifies Accept-Ranges to be a response 
>       field in Section 14.5. But there is no mention of this field in
>       the BNF for response header fields in Section 6.2.
>       Accept-Ranges seems to have been grouped along with the other 
>       fields of the request-header, but does not find a place in the BNF
>       for request-header fields also. Is it an extension header?
>       Could anybody please clarify this?
>       Thanks in advance,
>       Ramya T.V.
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 1997 12:44:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC