- From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:54:59 -0500
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>>>>> "JM" == Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com> writes: JM> After thinking about this some more, I believe we've (almost) all JM> missed an obvious solution. JM> If a message is sent on a persistent connection using JM> a transfer-coding that does not exactly preserve the JM> length of the data being encoding, then the "chunked" JM> transfer-coding MUST be used, and MUST be the last JM> transfer-coding applied. [...] JM> a server could send JM> HTTP/1.1 200 OK JM> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 20:33:51 GMT JM> Transfer-Encoding: compress, chunked JM> 3039 JM> ... compressed data ... JM> 0 Simple and elegant. Let's make it so. -- Scott Lawrence EmWeb Embedded Server <lawrence@agranat.com> Agranat Systems, Inc. Engineering http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Friday, 12 December 1997 15:10:05 UTC