W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997


From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:52:38 -0800
Message-Id: <5CEA8663F24DD111A96100805FFE6587203787@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'David W. Morris'" <dwm@xpasc.com>
Cc: 'http-wg' <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, 'Jim Gettys' <jg@w3.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4805
How the server does it's timeout is completely up to it, or more precisely,
up to the application that uses the server.

As far as I can tell, the people who want this have quite well formed ideas
as to how long the timeout should be, so we don't need to include

As to the second suggestion, which I'll call  "2xx Logout", I'm agnostic,
and await more WG feedback.

Received on Monday, 24 November 1997 09:59:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC