W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

Re: Accept-Transfer header field (was HTTP/1.1 Issues:

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 97 15:22:59 PST
Message-Id: <9711192323.AA04464@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com

Koen writes:

    Let me clarify my position: I think it would be OK to add an
    extensibility mechanism of the usual ;name=value type, but we should
    not define lots of complicated name=value pairs right now.
    
Then we are in perfect agreement.

-Jeff

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 1997 15:29:29 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Koen Holtman: "Re: Accept-Transfer header field (was HTTP/1.1 Issues:"
Previous message: rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com: "Re: HTTP/1.1 ISSUE: TRAILER_FIELDS - Proposed Resolution"
In reply to: Koen Holtman: "Re: Accept-Transfer header field (was HTTP/1.1 Issues:"
Next in thread: Scott Lawrence: "Re: Accept-Transfer header field (was HTTP/1.1 Issues:"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:03 EDT