W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

Re: Accept-Transfer header field (was HTTP/1.1 Issues:

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 97 15:22:59 PST
Message-Id: <9711192323.AA04464@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4750
Koen writes:

    Let me clarify my position: I think it would be OK to add an
    extensibility mechanism of the usual ;name=value type, but we should
    not define lots of complicated name=value pairs right now.
Then we are in perfect agreement.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 1997 15:29:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC