W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:13:26 PST
Message-Id: <3469D5A6.98BD0677@parc.xerox.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com

I really meant it the other way around: could the proposed
'Alternates' header be useful for email delivery, or even
for a HTTP delivery of multipart/alternatives?

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 1997 08:14:48 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"
Previous message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
In reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
Next in thread: Graham Klyne: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:02 EDT