W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

RE: New I-D for Http Jaye Trust State Mgt

From: Jaye, Dan <DJaye@engagetech.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 16:17:24 -0500
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=CMG%l=ANDEXC01-971028211724Z-3079@wilexc01.cmgi.com>
To: 'Dave Kristol' <dmk@bell-labs.com>
Cc: "'http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com'" <http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com>, "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Understandable confusion.

Dave,

The draft that I emailed out from the IETF meeting in Munich (v01) was 
bounced when submitted (because of the rule prohibiting submissions 
until after the meeting was concluded).

I submitted the new draft (v02) last week.  The ID administrator 
renumbered v02 to v01 so it would sequentially follow the previous 
(official) version.  For simplicity, let's assume that the latest 
version is v01 and ignore the (unofficial) version I emailed to the 
list from Munich.

Apologies for the confusion.

-Dan



-----Original Message-----
From:	Dave Kristol [SMTP:dmk@bell-labs.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 28, 1997 3:59 PM
To:	Jaye, Dan
Cc:	'http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com'; 
'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'
Subject:	Re: New I-D for Http Jaye Trust State Mgt

I'm confused.  The draft that was announced via the IETF today was
draft-ietf-http-jaye-trust-state-01.txt, but your email announced 
(and
contains) draft-ietf-http-jaye-trust-state-02.txt.  How are they
related?

Dave Kristol


Daniel Jaye                                     djaye@engagetech.com
Chief Technology Officer                             v(508) 684-3641
Engage Technologies                                  f(508) 684-3636
100 Brickstone Square, 1st Floor, Andover, MA  01810
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 1997 13:21:40 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:02 EDT