W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

Interoperability Test 10-16

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:18:49 -0400
Message-Id: <199710111418.KAA10689@devnix.agranat.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4549

  The first HTTP/1.1 Multi-Vendor Internet Test Day is Oct 16.

  If you plan to participate, please register by filling out the
  survey form at the end of this mail, and sending it to
  'httptest@agranat.com' by your close of business on Tuesday, Oct 14.
  I will combine them and forward them as a single mailing on
  Wednesday to all who signed up.  If you will have multiple instances
  of the same implementation and configuration active, send that as
  one registration; if you will have different implementations or
  configurations active please send those separately so that it is
  clear just what each active system should be.

  All are welcome, including 1.0 implementations (testing backward
  compatibility is important too).

  One special request to proxy vendors; it would be very usefull if
  there were proxies available that were configured to forward only to
  another proxy server so that we can see the results of chained
  proxies, including chains of mixed vendors and mixed HTTP revisions.
  If this is too cumbersome to set up for this week, please think
  about it for the future.

  Test Day Ground Rules:

    - Participating systems may be configured to allow access only by
      announced participants for that week (if you will be using a
      dynamically assigned IP address, indicate this and try to
      specify the range from which it will be chosen).

    - Participants will, on request, make a reasonable effort to
      provide whatever relevant log or trace data they have to other
      participants to resolve problems.

    - If a problem or possible issue with another participant
      implementation is found, that issue will be communicated to the
      contact for that implementation promptly.  Only if the
      involved participants disagree on the correct behavior or if
      the involved participants agree to do so will the issue be
      brought to the working group mailing list.

    - Any other disclosure of problems found with other
      implementations during these tests is poor form.

    - Communicating positive results to other participants is
      strongly encouraged.

  Additional suggestions welcome.



    User-Agent or Server string: (may be approximate)

    HTTP Role: [origin, proxy, tunnel, client, robot, ...]

    HTTP Version:

    Address: (DNS host names and/or IP addresses for the HTTP

    Time: (GMT times the system will be active or available)

    Contact Name:  (person to contact with an issue)

    Contact Email:

    Contact Phone:

    Contact Hours: (GMT times the contact is available, should overlap
                    the span in Time, but may be a subset)

    Notes: other relevant information, possibly including URLs for
           information on where to find background material.
Received on Saturday, 11 October 1997 07:21:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC