W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997


From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@appliedtheory.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 10:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199709221428.KAA25534@pat.appliedtheory.com>
To: http working group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4472
In general I think this is a big advantage to application and
specification developers alike.

I have a very non traditional type of http/1.1 application that falls
into the 'origin server' category but is not the general purpose type
of application the specification seems oriented towards.. this summary
would benefit me greatly in double checking compliance by determining
the relevant requirements.

the spreadsheet format is great, but will it include the glossary of
footnote resolutions? as that is likely to be perpetually evolving as

Received on Monday, 22 September 1997 07:32:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC