- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:12:14 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@acm.org>
- Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, mdw@itc.kodak.com
Graham Klyne: > >At 10:40 AM 9/18/97 PDT, Larry Masinter wrote: > >[...] >>But this is already work in progress: >> >> draft-ietf-http-feature-reg-02.txt describes a mechanism >>for registration of features such as color depth and number of pixels, >>and draft-ietf-http-negotiation-03.txt includes an "accept-features" >>header. > >This is being picky, but Koen's up to ...-04 on the 'negotiation' draft. Yes. By the way, I maintain a page on it at http://gewis.win.tue.nl/~koen/conneg/ . You can also find a scenario draft there. To pick another nit, I would not really call the above a `work in progress', at least it won't progress much further in this working group. The working group will not propose standard HTTP headers for specifying client display attributes. It will finish the work above soon by releasing the protocol in the form of `experimental RFCs'. These experimental RFCs are not standards, but merely encourage interested parties to try out the protocol. If deployment of these experimental RFCs snowballs, then there will probably be a new IETF working group which works them into a real standard. All this means that standard HTTP headers for specifying client display attributes will not appear very soon, if ever. My most optimistic estimate puts it at 1 to 2 years. I don't have very high hopes for there being an ad-hoc standard in the mean time either. I remember that some Japanese client implementers are using a common format for encoding some atribures in the User-Agent header field, but I can't find any reference to it. >GK. Koen.
Received on Friday, 19 September 1997 01:19:32 UTC