W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

indefinite server-push (was 'Last-Modified in chunked footer')

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:32:09 PDT
Message-Id: <341D54F9.3FFB004C@parc.xerox.com>
To: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4405
In reply to:
> I think that "indefinitely long server push" should be explicitly
> disallowed. What's a robot to do, for example? I suppose this
> is a different topic.

Ben Laurie said:
> Try ringing you local TV station and telling them they have to stop
> broadcasting after 3 hours, because your VCR runs out of tape. :-)

but seriously, shouldn't there be an expectation that a single
HTTP request should get a complete reply, properly terminated,
within a relatively small amount of time, and that a continuous
entity body without termination (delivered through chunked encoding,
perhaps) is not a valid HTTP response?

If we don't disallow such things, a proxy implementation which attempted
to buffer complete responses before sending them on would be

Received on Monday, 15 September 1997 08:35:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:21 UTC