W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1997

RE: Last-Modified in chunked footer

From: Henry Sanders (Exchange) <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 11:22:51 -0700
Message-Id: <7D9A01DBBFD5CF11AD0F0000F8411F8A96FB54@ROADKILL>
To: 'Scott Lawrence' <lawrence@agranat.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> LM> I don't think we can continue to evalute these one-by-one, though.
> LM> Is there some general principle to apply?
> 
>   If the value of the header field may be dependant on the content,
>   then it might be desirable to send that field in the trailer.
> 
What do we say about trailers on chunked PUTs? There are fields that
depend on the content (like Content-Type) that a server handling a PUT
might want to see early on. 
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 1997 11:26:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:33:00 EDT