Re: FW: revised trusted cookie spec

It was hard to separate your quotation from your statement, but I think
you said:

> My proposal does not put the privacy policy inside the state mgt 
> mechanism.  A separate PICS-Label header is used.  It merely 
> establishes how you relate cookie handling to privacy policies.  Do 
> you think it is unnecessary to establish that link (from within the 
> http protocol)?

I think a privacy policy should be more comprehensive than merely a
policy about cookie handling, so a Pics-Label header that's solely
useful for labelling cookies seems pretty useless to me.

Larry
-- 
http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter