- From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 19:42:27 -0500 (EST)
- To: fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu> wrote: >As Foteos hinted, swapping the meaning of 302 and 303 is a solution >to the implementation problem. I don't think it would affect Apache much. >However, it would require universal agreement among the rest of the >implementers, and it would require recycling HTTP/1.1 as Proposed >and not as a Draft Standard. It is not something to be taken lightly. Unfortunately, when I get stuff I wrote back from a list server and re-read it, it often becomes clear that I don't understand what I'm talking about. For a 301 on a POST, does that really mean substitute the new RequestURI for all future submissions, or only when the content is identical to that of the current submission? Fote ========================================================================= Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 =========================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 1997 16:49:05 UTC