W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: 301/302

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 15:11:41 -0700
To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9707291527.aa15806@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3998
As Foteos hinted, swapping the meaning of 302 and 303 is a solution
to the implementation problem.  I don't think it would affect Apache much.
However, it would require universal agreement among the rest of the
implementers, and it would require recycling HTTP/1.1 as Proposed
and not as a Draft Standard.  It is not something to be taken lightly.

.....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 1997 15:39:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC