W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: [URN] HTTP resolution protocol

From: John C. Mallery <jcma@ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 18:34:51 -0400
Message-Id: <v0311070caff44e1e6098@[]>
To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>
Cc: Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com>, HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3792
At 3:04 PM -0700 1996-11-04, Ron Daniel wrote:

>>IMHO, HTTP URN resolvers should follow HTTP 1.1 on use of "Accept:".
>OK, I will add words to the effect that the resolver SHOULD
>restrict the resources returned to those in the Accept: header.

Now that we have your attention, can we come up with an HTTP 1.1 extension
method to do resolution rather than the magic directory hack?
Received on Thursday, 17 July 1997 15:47:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC