W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

RE: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 12:33:01 -0700
Message-Id: <11352BDEEB92CF119F3F00805F14F4850332A6BF@RED-44-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'koen@win.tue.nl'" <koen@win.tue.nl>
Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Who intends to implement it?
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	koen@win.tue.nl [SMTP:koen@win.tue.nl]
> Sent:	Friday, July 11, 1997 12:17 AM
> To:	Yaron Goland
> Cc:	koen@win.tue.nl; masinter@parc.xerox.com;
> http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Subject:	Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) "
> to Propo
> 
> Yaron Goland:
> >
> >That is not accurate, Microsoft is planning on implementing hit
> meeting.
> >I also know that AOL and Netscape have expressed interest although,
> in
> >so far as I am aware, neither party has committed to an
> implementation.
> 
> Ah, thanks for the information!  This is the first time I hear about
> any vendor planning to implement hit metering.
> 
> >As for RFC 2109, what happens to a protocol that is broken and that
> no
> >one intends to implement?
> 
> It is not broken (at least less so than Netscape cookies, which are
> the current state of the art), and we have at least one implementer
> who intends to implement.
> 
> >		Yaron
> 
> Koen.
Received on Friday, 11 July 1997 12:39:41 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:46 EDT