W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

RE: confidentiality and the referer field

From: Michael Giroux <mgiroux@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 20:17:06 -0700
Message-Id: <01BC826D.EBD85240.mgiroux@worldnet.att.net>
To: 'Hallam-Baker' <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Cc: "dwm@xpasc.com" <dwm@xpasc.com>, "http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com" <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>

On Thursday, June 26, 1997 7:55 PM, Hallam-Baker [SMTP:hallam@ai.mit.edu] 
wrote:
> This is an issue that absolutely belongs at the application
> protocol and no other.

Yes, I agree.  I've been doing quite a bit of HTML lately, and this just 
jumped to mind, but your observation is completely correct.

Michael Giroux

Received on Thursday, 26 June 1997 20:23:39 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: Status 100"
Previous message: Hallam-Baker: "Re: confidentiality and the referer field"
Maybe in reply to: Hallam-Baker: "confidentiality and the referer field"
Next in thread: Koen Holtman: "GET and referer security considerations"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:45 EDT