W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1997

Re: First draft of negotiation requirements document

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:14:17 -0400
Message-Id: <199706171914.PAA16440@devnix.agranat.com>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3543

  As one of 'those contributing to that discussion', I'd like to start
  by thanking you, Ted; very well done.  Aside from the couple of
  comments below, I believe this sums up the requirements nicely.

"ID" == <draft-ietf-http-negotiation-scenarios-00.txt>

ID>      Scenarios for the Delivery of Negotiated Content using HTTP
ID> ...
ID> 4. Requirements for effective content negotiation

  I would like to see some discussion in this section expressing a
  preference for solutions which do not require an additional
  client/server round trip.  Something along the lines of what you
  have now regarding bandwidth.

ID> 5.2.1. Elective negotiation

ID>           "Transport   Content Negotiation in HTTP"
    should be "Transparent Content Negotiation in HTTP"

Scott Lawrence           EmWeb Embedded Server       <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.        Engineering            http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 1997 12:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:20 UTC