>A good requirements document states the problem and a set of tests that >would verify that the problem has been solved. I think Ted Hardie made >a start on those two items, whereas I don't think Koen's statement does >either. Yes. The universal reaction I get when I ask people why they think we're not making progress on TCN is that there isn't agreement on the requirements. Since Ted has made a good start, I'm hoping he'll volunteer to shepherd the requirements document through the process. Otherwise, we'll need someone else to try to manage the document through the consensus process. Larry -- http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinterReceived on Friday, 6 June 1997 01:54:36 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:44 EDT