Re: A linguistic note on unverifiable transactions from Koen Holtman on 1997-04-25 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 1997)

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:42:46 +0200 (MET DST)
To: "David W. Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <199704251942.VAA01046@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>

David W. Morris:
[...]
>
>Actually 'unverifiable transaction' is bad spec termnology as it implies
>there might be a verifiable transaction.

??

Verifiable transactions do exist, and are defined by the spec.

>Dave Morris

Koen.

Received on Friday, 25 April 1997 12:48:33 UTC