W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1997

RE: 1xx Clarification

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 17:55:03 -0700
Message-Id: <11352BDEEB92CF119F3F00805F14F4850277F074@RED-44-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
That was the assumption.
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Roy T. Fielding [SMTP:fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU]
> Sent:	Sunday, April 13, 1997 6:46 PM
> To:	Yaron Goland
> Cc:	http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
> Subject:	Re: 1xx Clarification 
> 
> >Section 8.2 of RFC 2068 has the following requirement:
> >
> >o  An HTTP/1.1 (or later) client MUST be prepared to accept a 100
> >   (Continue) status followed by a regular response.
> >
> >I have gone around asking people if the following behavior is legal:
> >
> >User Establishes Connection
> >
> >Server sends first 1xx Response
> >
> >User sends GET
> 
> Just a clarification: this would be assuming that the server knows
> that the client supports HTTP/1.1 before it makes the first request
> (as would be the case for some non-typical-web services, which is what
> I think Yaron is envisioning).
> 
> .....Roy
Received on Monday, 14 April 1997 22:53:42 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:34 EDT