W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1997

Proposed amendment to RFC2109

From: Jaye, Dan <DJaye@engagetech.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 21:18:17 -0500
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=CMG%l=ANDEXC01-970404021817Z-32051@wilexc01.cmgi.com>
To: "'http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "'ahyde@focalink.com'" <ahyde@focalink.com>, "'rodger@worldnet.atg.net'" <rodger@worldnet.atg.net>
As promised, here is a description of our proposal to amend RFC2109
to allow certification of unverifiable transactions.

I have two questions in particular regarding this proposal:

1)  Should "certified" cookies be a third! type of cookie header
	[this is what we have written in the proposal] or can we
	incorporate the certificate as an option in the SetCookie2 header?

2) Can we include this in the next version of RFC2109 or must it be a
	separate RFC?
>)>)>)>)>)---------------------------------------->>>>>>>
Daniel Jaye                         djaye@engagetech.com    
Engage Technologies, Inc.                (508)684-3641 v
100 Brickstone Square, Andover MA 01810  (508)684-3636 f
Received on Thursday, 3 April 1997 18:21:04 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:34 EDT