W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1997

RE: new cookie draft

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 01:39:19 -0800
Message-Id: <11352BDEEB92CF119F3F00805F14F485026B7244@RED-44-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'hedlund@best.com'" <hedlund@best.com>
Cc: 'Dave Kristol' <dmk@bell-labs.com>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Cool. David, what do you think? We define PORT. If it is included then
the cookie may only be returned on the port it is received. If it is not
included then the cookie may be returned on any port within the domain.
		Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	M. Hedlund [SMTP:hedlund@best.com]
> Sent:	Friday, March 21, 1997 7:27 PM
> To:	Yaron Goland
> Cc:	'Dave Kristol'; http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
> Subject:	RE: new cookie draft
> 
> 
> On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Yaron Goland wrote:
> > We can
> > define an attribute "PORT", with no argument. If it is included in a
> > cookie then the cookie may only be returned on the port it was
> received
> > on, this requirement applies to all domains. 
> 
> That sounds right.  
> 
> M. Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>
Received on Saturday, 22 March 1997 01:40:49 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:32 EDT