Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft

On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Larry Masinter wrote (re: rationale for privacy
requirements):
> Given how often this issue seems to be raised, do you think it would
> help to have a more explicit rationale for this design beyond the mail
> messages and and the blow-by-blow commentary of the minutes?

I've thought about this a fair amount since receiving this message, but I
am satisfied with the language of section 7.1 (Privacy: User Agent
Control).  It doesn't seem to me that the dispute arises from confusion
over the intent of the draft; instead, we seem to be arguing over the
appropriateness of that intent.

M. Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 1997 10:16:34 UTC