- From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:07:14 +0100 (MET)
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>, Misha Wolf <misha.wolf@reuters.com>, www-international@w3.org
- Cc: Unicore <unicore@unicode.org>, Unicode <unicode@unicode.org>, Search <search@mccmedia.com>, ISO10646 <iso10646@listproc.hcf.jhu.edu>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Feb 5, 5:14pm, Martin J. Duerst wrote: > It is not very harmful to label such pages ISO-8859-1 or whatever. > But strictly speaking, it is not legal! If there are alternatives > for labeling, the most restrictive label should be used. If it's > labeled us-ascii, you know that it's going to pass though 7-bit > mail. Otherwise, you don't. It is not advisible, certainly, but it is legal. -- Chris Lilley, W3C [ http://www.w3.org/ ] Graphics and Fonts Guy The World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/people/chris/ INRIA, Projet W3C chris@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 93 65 79 87 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 1997 09:26:11 UTC