W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > January to April 1997

Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header

From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 19:28:37 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <9701101928.ZM14942@grommit.inria.fr>
To: jbettels@netscape.com, Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, ftang@netscape.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Alan_Barrett/DUB/Lotus.LOTUSINT@crd.lotus.com, Ed_Batutis/CAM/Lotus@crd.lotus.com, bobj@netscape.com, mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch, www-international@www10.w3.org, i18ngroup@netscape.com
On Jan 10,  8:39am, Jurgen Bettels wrote:

> I suggest having a wording saying that the wildcard in absence of
> a q-value should be used with a lower priority than any explicitly
> enumerated charset.

Right, good. Better than the fixed value I suggested. Similar for
Accept-Language and Accept, of course.

So in general, * means "if you don't have what I wanted I will take
whatever you have" while absence of * means "if you don't have what
I wanted, send a 300 Multiple Choices response"


-- 
Chris Lilley, W3C                          [ http://www.w3.org/ ]
Graphics and Fonts Guy            The World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/people/chris/              INRIA,  Projet W3C
chris@w3.org                       2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 93 65 79 87       06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 10 January 1997 10:32:13 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:25 EDT