Larry Masinter: [...] >Perhaps one of the requirements for 'feature registration' should be a >that the registration form contain N different URLs where the content >actually differs depending on whether the feature is or is not >present. > >At least then others would have some test cases. We certainly thought about such a requirement when we were writing the document, but we could not figure out how to put it in. The problem is that, if these N different URLs already exist, this would be proof that negotiation on the feature can already be done without registering a new feature tag. In general, it is hard to add an `actual usefullness' requirement without having a review board in the loop, and we don't want to have a review board. We do have the following field in the registration form: Applications or sites which will use this feature tag: [optional] | For applications, also specify the number of the first version | which will use the tag. the idea is that, if the author leaves this blank, this would be a good warning sign that you should not take the tag too seriously. >Larry Koen.Received on Sunday, 8 December 1996 04:03:24 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:18 EDT