W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-00.txt

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 14:01:24 -0400
Message-Id: <199610101801.OAA02570@nathaniel.ebt>
To: MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>>The I18N draft does not make POST use mandatory at all. A Safe header
>>could equally well be used to indicate that a GET-with-body result
>>can be cached/reused.
>
>	Yes, but as things *presently* stand in existing IETF RFCs
>and IDs, to use ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data" the FORM will specify
>METHOD=POST. 

The "will" here implies a requirement, which I have not seen. There are
strong recommendations, yes, but no requirements.
Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 11:07:44 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:15 EDT