W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 09:16:16 -0400
Message-Id: <199610101316.JAA02284@nathaniel.ebt>
To: fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU
Cc: MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1739
>This issue has nothing whatsoever to do with i18n.  i18n does not
>*need* to use POST requests any more than non-i18n activities need
>to use POST requests, and if you folks would stop knee-jerking every time
>the subject was brought up you might get a little more accomplished.

Correct, though I18N does need message bodies for correct labelling
of submitted data.

Do I always jerk my knees?
Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 06:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:18 UTC