W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > September to December 1996

Re: wording nits: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:37:06 -0700
To: dmk@research.bell-labs.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9609261538.aa15592@paris.ics.uci.edu>
> 1) The draft makes many mentions of "request message", which is never
> defined.  Section 5 comes close.  I propose that the heading for
> Section 5 be changed to "Request Message".

Ummm, "request message" is redundant, but it is certainly defined.
I've no opinion on changing the name of the section headings, provided
they remain consistent with the response.

> 2) Section 9.8 TRACE
> "... the response SHOULD contain the entire request message in the
> entity-body,..."
> I read this to mean
> 	- the Request-Line
> 	- the request headers
> 	- CRLF
> 
> Correct?

Yes.

 ...Roy T. Fielding
    Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
    University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
    http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/
Received on Thursday, 26 September 1996 16:35:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:14 EDT