W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: digest vs basic

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:00:16 PDT
To: pjc@trusted.com
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <96Aug28.150016pdt."2733"@golden.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1509
> As larry has pointed out, basic for client / server non persistant requests
> is a poor choice.

Please, no. It has nothing to do with 'non-persistant' requests, it
just has to do with multiple requests where state management is wanted
but the current mechanisms for state management (cookies, etc.) are
not used.

Received on Wednesday, 28 August 1996 15:02:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:18 UTC