W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 96 12:16:07 MDT
Message-Id: <9608201916.AA18895@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: hallam@ai.mit.edu
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1430
    The extended log format can be implemented in an afternoon with
    little trouble provided the items logged are fixed. If you go for
    allowing a choice of the items to log it gets trickier but not

    The pain for Xlog is for the analysis tool writers, not the server
    writers :-)

How does your technique (with the server asking the proxy to transmit
a large log) work when there are multiple levels of proxy involved,
some of which may be hidden behind firewalls?

Received on Tuesday, 20 August 1996 12:26:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:18 UTC