W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 17:56:44 -0700
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9608141756.aa03108@paris.ics.uci.edu>

HEAD is not a NOOP, OPTIONS is.  What is the rationale for
using HEAD to relay the final count instead of OPTIONS?
Does it make a difference when going through old proxies?

....Roy [just curious]

Received on Wednesday, 14 August 1996 18:12:31 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP""
Previous message: David W. Morris: "Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles"
In reply to: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP""
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP""
Reply: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP""

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:07 EDT