W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Sticky stuff.

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 19:48:34 -0400 ()
To: Lou Montulli <montulli@netscape.com>
Cc: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>, hallam@etna.ai.mit.edu, jg@zorch.w3.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.3.95.960812194225.-416697C-100000@hilly.oit.unc.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1325
Yeah - sticky headers take roughly the same amount of work to implement on
the client side as SCP, and aren't nearly as big a win for http-1 class

The real wins from this sort of thing come when you go balls out to keep
request/responses under a packet, and in many of those situations you
don't have a connection going anyway, so you need to go to cached

Received on Monday, 12 August 1996 16:51:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC