W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: hit-metering poll

From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 12:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Cc: 'http-wg' <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960806115306.4161A-100000@ns.viet.net>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1212
On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, Paul Leach wrote:

> I need data from any content providers on this list!

It isn't content providers you need to ask - it is the people who write
the log analysis programs. Few people roll their own. I am one of those
people who have written a log analysis package for public use
(<URL:http://www.netimages.com/~snowhare/utilities/>) so....

> When you do hit counting:
> Do you count HEADs and GETs as hits?

I count whatever the server writers put in their log: GET, HEAD, POST -

> Do you count conditional GETs that return 304 (Not modified) as hits?
> (I.e., where the requester already had a copy of the page, and was just
> checking to see if it was up-to-date.)

Yes. I also account for them seperately to allow measuring how significant
code 304's are on a particular server. I *don't* count codes 302, 400,
401, 402, 500 or 501, except in seperate categories just for those codes. 

Benjamin Franz
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 1996 12:09:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC