W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

RE: The Title header

From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 09:17:45 -0700
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-77-MSG-960719161745Z-10509@tide19.microsoft.com>
To: 'Gisle Aas' <aas@a.sn.no>, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1142

>From: 	Roy T. Fielding[SMTP:fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU]
>Sent: 	Friday, July 19, 1996 3:36 AM
>To: 	Gisle Aas
>Cc: 	http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>Subject: 	Re: The Title header 
>Hi Gisle,
>> Why and when did the Title: header disappear? (I find it in
>> v11-spec-01, but not in v11-spec-06)
>Sometime between those drafts.  It was removed because it wasn't being
>used much, because it duplicates the purpose of Content-Description
>in MIME, and because, like any Entity-Header, it can be used freely
>without the need for standardization.

Don't you mean "no standardization in HTTP"? If it is to be of more than
private use, then it is extremely useful to have a spec somewhere that
says what it means, so that everyone uses it in the same way to mean the
same thing. Said spec could even be a standard.

Received on Friday, 19 July 1996 09:45:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC