W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 96 17:06:06 MDT
Message-Id: <9607120006.AA16426@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: Albert Lunde <Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1107
    But it does have one property I like: I'd say rather than just say
    "choose the referal info with the best cost metric" I'd like
    to say that clients should choose in a quasi-random way among
    options with an equal cost metric.  (What they do in the case
    of unequal costs needs to be refined further to define what
    this would mean.)

I agree; we should include an explicit recommendation to
randomly choose between equal-metric referrals.  But we
need to think a bit harder about whether this choice should
be made per-request or "per session", however one defines
that.  I suspect that if clients do it per-request, this 
will play havoc with caches and with updates.

But I would also expect servers to offer referral-lists that
include referrals of quite different metrics.  This would
be used to tell a client, for example, to use the "nearest"
site as long as it was up, but to fail over to a more distant
site if the preferred one became unreachable.  It's not
inconceivable that a server could offer different referral-lists
to different clients, depending on each client's location in the
Internet topology.

Received on Thursday, 11 July 1996 17:16:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC