W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: charset flap

From: Erik van der Poel <erik@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 10:52:07 -0700
Message-Id: <31D41BC7.4DAA@netscape.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/992
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Larry Masinter wrote:
> > 
> >  b) charset MUST be supplied with all responses
> >     explicit "charset=x-unknown" if that's the case.
> >
> > I believe choice (b) was acceptable to everyone in the room, including
> > HTTP/1.1 client and server implementors. The two choices are
> > practically the same except that choice (b) will promote the more
> > frequent use of an explicit "charset=x-unknown" for content where that
> > is the case.
> And break all older (pre mid-95) clients that share a common cache with
> any HTTP/1.1 clients.

I will admit that I don't understand caches very well. If Roy is right,
then this would indeed be a problem, because the current Navigator
installed base treats "charset=x-unknown" as if it were ISO 8859-1, but
there is a bug in that it does not allow the user to override this using
the charset menu.

I would tend to agree with Roy that it seems dangerous to be adding
untested stuff to the spec at this stage.

Received on Friday, 28 June 1996 10:58:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC