W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: TRACE as traceroute

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 05:23:46 -0700
To: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9606280523.aa29898@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/991
> One of the reputed purposes of the TRACE method is (I believe) a
> traceroute-like mechanism through Web proxies.  To that end, I think it
> would be useful if proxies added a timestamp to the Via: header that
> they add to a TRACE response.  Because comments are allowed in the Via:
> syntax, this could actually be done without changing the protocol. (But
> it would be nice to permit more than one comment by changing the syntax
> from "comment" to "*comment".)

The goal was to minimize the Via syntax overhead, since it will be required
for all HTTP/1.1 intermediaries (proxies and gateways).  There is
only one comment *per-entry*, and even that is discouraged.  We don't
need a timestamp in general, but I suppose adding one within the
comment ONLY during TRACE requests would be good implementation advice.

 ...Roy T. Fielding
    Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
    University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
Received on Friday, 28 June 1996 05:45:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC