W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)

From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 11:22:48 -0700
Message-Id: <199606061822.LAA27356@samba.amazon.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Roy T. Fielding writes:
 > > It would, if it were there in earlier versions of the protocol.  In
 > > 1.0 all you get is mashed User-Agent headers and the occasional
 > > Forwarded header, if you're lucky. It would be far more reliable to
 > > make it mandatory for 1.1 servers to "report on their neighbors".
 > 
 > Please read the description of the Via header field.  It does that.
 > 
 > 
 >  ...Roy T. Fielding
 >     Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
 >     University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
 >     http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/
 > 

Duh.  Another misreading on my part.  Never mind.
I'm glad it does what I wanted it to, anyway.

--Shel
Received on Thursday, 6 June 1996 11:41:21 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:03 EDT