Koen: > always assumed that > the Last-Modified header applied to the variant, not to the whole > resource. Roy: It applies to the resource as a whole, which explains why the definition was the way it was (i.e., specified in terms of how the recipient will interpret it) and should be. I agree with Koen on this one. At the very least, it should be at the origin server's option to decide whether to keep distinct Last-Modified dates for each variant, or to use the maximum over all of the variants of a resource. Whether or not this has been easy for the CERN and Apache servers is basically irrelevant, since I see no reason why the protocol specification should require it, and it might be much harder to implement in other contexts. -JeffReceived on Tuesday, 4 June 1996 15:01:07 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 06:32:02 EDT