W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg-old@w3.org > May to August 1996

Re: Rev81: byte range inconsistencies

From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 96 18:01:20 EDT
Message-Id: <9606032201.AA05094@zp.tempo.att.com.tempo.att.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: mogul@pa.dec.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/760
I accept Jeff Mogul's proposed adjustments, to wit:

1) 206 Partial Content
reworded to allow either Content-Range (for a single byte range) or

2) Allowing multipart/byteranges only when the client requested more
than one byte range in Ranges, thus implying its support for same.

Dave Kristol
Received on Monday, 3 June 1996 15:07:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:40:17 UTC